Now a few very imp questions arise which are:
ONE ‘ PRIORITY ’ pursued in Almost Every Country is which appears to be Logical , but in my humble opinion It is ‘ Quasi Logical ’ ‘ IMPROPER / WRONG ‘, which is that ! “ ULTRA RESPECT IS DEMANDED AND GIVEN TO THE JUDGES ” OR the “ Judiciary ” and Raising of Any voice against it is “ IMMEDIATELY CHECKED BY STRICT CONTEMPT OF COURT LAWS ” and this way even “ POSITIVE CRITICISM ” IS not Permitted. SO I Analyzed that the “ Priority Pursued ” by most Countries in their Systems of Justice that “ Contempt of Court ” Will be there if it is needed and this way ANY CRITICISM BE IT THE MOST CREATIVE AND POSITIVE CAN BE CALLED CONTEMPT OF THE COURT but we “ FORGET OUR MAIN GOAL OF PURPOSE ” which is basically the welfare of the people, and these “ Contempt Laws ” Finally Act in the Reverse Direction and mane the Legal Systems more ‘ Hand ’. So the Main Priority of “ Public Welfare ” is deleted because “ If There Is No Positive Criticism on any Warning System be it ‘ Judiciary ’ , Health or Education ”, it will go Stagnant and Stale. Positive Criticism shows that you are questioned and you are Answerable. So finally I Impounded a Law:
“ The greater are the Prohibitions on Criticism about a System on Governmental Organizations / Private Organizations, the GREATER WILL THE PROGRESS OF THOSE SYSTEMS GO DOWN or those systems become ” “ Stagnant OR STALE ”. So there is a “ Directly Proportional ” Relationship between “ Permission of Criticism and PROGRESS OF THE SYSTEMS ” or in Scientific Way: Criticism Progress. So the “ Resultant ” is a “ Regular Decline ” in the Performance of Judiciary and delivering of ‘ Real Justice ’ —-though flies in courts are filled with sentence line “ In the Interests OF Justice ” —these orders are being given.
At the Top these “ Systems of Justice ” in most of the countries have had been “ UNABLE TO SHOW PROPER PERFORMANCE IN TERMS OF DELIVERING ‘ REAL JUSTICE ’ “. Years and Years of Legal Fights or Litigations , Technicalities , Hardness of the ‘ Legal Systems ’ to go for ‘ Logic or Common Sense ’ or Allow any ‘ Change ’ ends up in more and more Suffering of Human Beings . So Results Prove that :
“ There Must be room for ” Criticism / or Positive Criticism ”, Discussions , and “ Complaints ”—which are addressed Immediately and properly. Right Now mostly ‘ No Effective Systems ’ of Complaint against the Judges are there and those which are , finally Result in delivering Least. So if you keep “ Countless Fines and Penalties ” for the “ Public ” and there are “ NO CHECKS ” on the Judges / Officers , who are born with the Same. Set of “ Traits Positive and Negative ”, then how Can you “ Expect ” them to deliver If No “ System of Checks ” is on their Heads. So the Environments of “ FEAR ” / Poor Performance will be there if their are No CREATIVE AND INNOVATIVE CHANGES which allow inflow of new ideas and Ensures that those are being implemented.