“PRESENT-DAY EDUCATION IS IN CHAINS”

Now a few very imp questions arise which are:

1. If some person says that I want to smuggle drugs and wants our opinion then we definitely tell that person that “IT IS ILLEGAL AND YOU SHOULD NOT DO SUCH A THING”.
2. Same way if we are asked by someone that he plans to murder a person then we will tell him as in above case.
3. Now the question arises that if a student or a person of any age says that I want to study “Chemistry” at a higher Level and admission in colleges/Universities is not available and he says that I want to study it personally outside the Institutions. Teachers and practicals Practice is easily available to the said person, THEN WHAT WRONG OR ILLEGA;ITY WILL BE IN THAT?. SO SAME IS THE PROBLEM IN CASE OF MANY SUBJECTS, DISCIPLINES AND PROFESSIONS BUT EDUCATION DEPARTMENTS IN MANY COUNTRIES DON”T ALLOW DUE TO THEIR POLICIES EVEN IN CASE OF SIMPLE “THEORATICAL SUBJECTS” LIKE LAW. SO WHY THIS……….. THE ANSWER TO THIS WILL BE FINALLY FOUND IN “VESTED INTERESTS” OF INSTITUTIONS AND GOVERNAMENTS AND AT TIMES IN WRONG POLICIES BEING PURSUED.
4. Same way there is unlimited Information available that How Systems/ Institutions are exploiting people.
5. SO WE CONCLUDE THAT EVEN IF SOME STUDENTS OR PERSONS ARE IN PURSUIT OF THIS NOBLE VIRTUE OF GETTING KNOWLEDGE, THEN THERE ARE DIFFERENT BARRIES BY GOVERNAMENTS OR SYSTEM SO WE SEE THAT “EDUCATION OR KNOWLEDGE ARE IN CHAINS” WHICH INTERESTINGLY WERE NOT EVEN IF WE SEE HUNDREDS OF YEARS BACK. Still many Arguments can be given against it, but the BITTER REALITY has been explained.
6. SO IF ONE WANTS TO PURSUE ANY DISCIPLINE OF KNOWLEDGE IN ANY AGE AND HAS THE MEANS OR CAN ARRANGE FOR IT, THEN IF “SEEKING KNOWLEDGE” IS NOT A CRIME OR ILLEGAL, THEN WHAT ON EARTH CAN EMPOWER US TO STOP THAT NOBLE PURSUIT.

ONE ‘ PRIORITY ’ pursued in Almost Every Country is which appears to be Logical , but in my humble opinion It is ‘ Quasi Logical ’ ‘ IMPROPER / WRONG ‘, which is that ! “ ULTRA RESPECT IS DEMANDED AND GIVEN TO THE JUDGES ” OR the “ Judiciary ” and Raising of Any voice against it is “ IMMEDIATELY CHECKED BY STRICT CONTEMPT OF COURT LAWS ” and this way even “ POSITIVE CRITICISM ” IS not Permitted. SO I Analyzed that the “ Priority Pursued ” by most Countries in their Systems of Justice that “ Contempt of Court ” Will be there if it is needed and this way ANY CRITICISM BE IT THE MOST CREATIVE AND POSITIVE CAN BE CALLED CONTEMPT OF THE COURT but we “ FORGET OUR MAIN GOAL OF PURPOSE ” which is basically the welfare of the people, and these “ Contempt Laws ” Finally Act in the Reverse Direction and mane the Legal Systems more ‘ Hand ’. So the Main Priority of “ Public Welfare ” is deleted because “ If There Is No Positive Criticism on any Warning System be it ‘ Judiciary ’ , Health or Education ”, it will go Stagnant and Stale. Positive Criticism shows that you are questioned and you are Answerable. So finally I Impounded a Law:

“LAW OF DETERIORATION/ DECLINE IN SYSTEMS”
(By: “Reformer T.M. Raasti”)

“ The greater are the Prohibitions on Criticism about a System on Governmental Organizations / Private Organizations, the GREATER WILL THE PROGRESS OF THOSE SYSTEMS GO DOWN or those systems become ” “ Stagnant OR STALE ”. So there is a “ Directly Proportional ” Relationship between “ Permission of Criticism and PROGRESS OF THE SYSTEMS ” or in Scientific Way: Criticism Progress. So the “ Resultant ” is a “ Regular Decline ” in the Performance of Judiciary and delivering of ‘ Real Justice ’ —-though flies in courts are filled with sentence line “ In the Interests OF Justice ” —these orders are being given.

At the Top these “ Systems of Justice ” in most of the countries have had been “ UNABLE TO SHOW PROPER PERFORMANCE IN TERMS OF DELIVERING ‘ REAL JUSTICE ’ “. Years and Years of Legal Fights or Litigations , Technicalities , Hardness of the ‘ Legal Systems ’ to go for ‘ Logic or Common Sense ’ or Allow any ‘ Change ’ ends up in more and more Suffering of Human Beings . So Results Prove that :

“ There Must be room for ” Criticism / or Positive Criticism ”, Discussions , and “ Complaints ”—which are addressed Immediately and properly. Right Now mostly ‘ No Effective Systems ’ of Complaint against the Judges are there and those which are , finally Result in delivering Least. So if you keep “ Countless Fines and Penalties ” for the “ Public ” and there are “ NO CHECKS ” on the Judges / Officers , who are born with the Same. Set of “ Traits Positive and Negative ”, then how Can you “ Expect ” them to deliver If No “ System of Checks ” is on their Heads. So the Environments of “ FEAR ” / Poor Performance will be there if their are No CREATIVE AND INNOVATIVE CHANGES which allow inflow of new ideas and Ensures that those are being implemented.